Chicago Tribune's Investigation Reveals the Human Cost Behind Operation Midway Blitz
Essential journalism documents ICE's Operation Midway Blitz: 4,500+ arrests over 64 days, but only 1.5% had violent felony convictions. At least 10 American citizens falsely charged.
I rarely highlight a single news article as the basis of an entire post, but I make exceptions for the exceptional. The Chicago Tribune published a deeply reported investigation into Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s “Operation Midway Blitz,” a 64-day enforcement operation that Trump himself characterized online as a military attack on a Democratic city. What makes this piece essential reading is how well it documents the gap between what the Trump administration claims about its enforcement priorities and the human cost of what actually happened on the ground.
Let’s start with the numbers. The Department of Homeland Security claims the operation resulted in more than 4,500 arrests and that it targeted “the worst of the worst” criminals. But a Tribune analysis of government data covering the first half of the operation found that only about 1.5% of those detained had been convicted of a violent felony or sex crime. At least 10 American citizens were falsely charged with federal crimes during the operation, with charges later dropped or dismissed.
These findings align with the national patterns I’ve been documenting throughout the year. As of December 13, 35% of people in ICE detention nationwide had no criminal charges or convictions, a number that has grown significantly each month of the first year of the administration. This represents a population that has grown 28 times since January 12, the last date before Trump took office. Chicago’s operation reflects this broader shift: enforcement that claims to prioritize public safety but in practice targets immigrants regardless of criminal history.
But the Chicago Tribune investigation does something that my data analysis alone definitely cannot do. Through extensive reporting by Andrew Carter, Caroline Kubzansky, Gregory Royal Pratt, and Laura Rodríguez Presa, we see what these policies mean for real people and communities in Chicago. Thank you to all of you and the rest of your unnamed team for your contribution to writing the first draft of history at this crucial moment.
The Chicago Tribune reporters chronicle not just the arrests but the fear that now permeates Chicago’s immigrant communities. It’s a great example of why I believe in local reporting so much and have spent time supporting the work of journalists across the country.
In the full article, we meet Mario Hernandez Garcia, who now suffers nightmares after being detained for five days at ICE’s Broadview facility, where he witnessed conditions so overcrowded that people urinated on the floor because they couldn’t access bathrooms. We learn about two landscapers arrested while mulching outside a building in Oak Park, deported to Mexico three days later. We see images the 8-year-old girl clutching her doll as federal officers led her and her family away from Millennium Park.
What strikes me most about the Chicago Tribune’s investigation is how it positions this moment historically and politically, reminding us that while ICE may justify its actions through a kind of legal absolutism, the ethical and political story is larger and more complex. Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, a former history teacher, tells the reporters: “Historians are not going to be kind to us in this moment. We should all be ashamed of what our country is doing in our name.” Governor Pritzker called ICE’s activity an “invasion,” reversing a narrative framing that is typically reserved for immigrants themselves. The article goes on to frame Operation Midway Blitz as “unlike anything in recent American history: the federal government sending agents dressed for war into neighborhoods of the country’s third-largest city to arrest mostly people who look Latino and to ask questions later.”
This kind of reporting matters because it creates an historical record. The data I track shows the scale and composition of enforcement nationwide, but the Chicago Tribune’s investigation shows what it looks like when federal agents execute that enforcement in practice, including the weapons pointed at bystanders, the families separated, the lives upended, the American citizens caught up in dragnet operations.
The Tribune’s investigation includes extensive documentation: the operational timeline, specific incidents across Chicago neighborhoods, interviews with detained individuals and their families, analysis of the administration’s claims versus the documented reality, accounts of protest and resistance. This is investigative journalism at its best.
As someone who has spent the year analyzing national enforcement data, I can confirm that Chicago represents a microcosm of what’s happening across the country. The disconnect between stated priorities (targeting serious criminals) and actual practice (mass arrests regardless of criminal history) appears consistent in city after city, operation after operation. Yes, ICE is arresting more people with violent criminal histories; but that does not appear to be what is actually driving overall enforcement and ICE continues to cherry-pick misrepresentative case studies while burying information about their own mistakes.
If you care about understanding what immigration enforcement actually looks like under this administration (not just what ICE’s press releases claim), read the full Tribune investigation. It’s thorough, unflinching, and essential. It connects the human stories to the broader patterns in ways that help us understand both the individual toll and the systemic nature of what’s happening.
The Chicago Tribune’s investigation deserves wide readership and recognition. Local journalism that documents what federal agencies actually do, rather than what they claim to do, is essential for democratic accountability.
Read “64 days in Chicago: The story of Operation Midway Blitz.” Yes, it is paywalled, but they have a New Years sale going on that allows you to get access for $1 for a year—well worth it to support the work of a pillar of American journalism.
Support Public Scholarship
This newsletter is only possible because of your support. If you believe in keeping this work free and open to the public, join the 100% of surveyed paid subscribers who said this newsletter is a good steward of their investment. You can read more about the mission and focus of this newsletter and learn why, after three years, I finally decided to offer a paid option.
Unfortunately, the Chicago Tribune subscription function isn't working right. I got all the way through to permanent buffer 3 times.
What happened to the American citizens? Were they held in those overcrowded jails with others? I'm beginning to wonder just how many wrongful arrest lawsuits against ICE have been filed. Perhaps we can sue ICE out of business!