Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Revolution Continues's avatar

I have a sort of history question: We used to have periodic "blanket amnesty" programs for immigrants who were undocumented. If they'd been in the US for a few years with no criminal record, they could apply and receive a green card. Why aren't we using this method of blanket amnesty to give DACA recipients ("Dreamers") and others a way to make their immigration status permanent and set them on the path toward citizenship? Thank you for your insights.

Expand full comment
Gaurav's avatar

Hi Austin! I haven’t been a subscriber for long so apologies if you’ve answered this already. It feels to me like technology has broken down the system of walk-in refugees and asylum seekers that was set up after WW2: there was an assumption that people fleeing problems would move into neighboring countries, usually in some sort of controlled way (land borders, trains, planes) and that natural barriers would keep large numbers of refugees out of the richer countries and spread them amongst poorer countries (e.g. Tibetan refugees in India). But technology has upended that: you can now fly to whichever country offers you the most opportunities, whether for economic improvement or for protection against your reasons for flight, and the internet makes it easier to find people willing to help. As the climate crisis increases refugee flows, I wonder if there needs to be a re-evaluation of the entire global refugee system that would make it harder for refugees to apply for asylum at national borders but make it easier for refugees to find immediate accommodation outside of their own countries as they wait for the Powers That Be to pick a country for them to reside in permanently (or at least until their home country becomes an option again). Is that the way we’re heading? Am I being overly pessimistic? Are there better alternatives?

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts